Issues in Vietnamese American Education: Future of Refugee History, Language, and Culture

    Overview

    Issues in Vietnamese American Education: Future of Refugee History, Language, and Culture

    Anastasia Nguyễn teaches in the Vietnamese-English dual-immersion program in San Jose’s Franklin-McKinley School District.Dual-immersion programs show promise in fighting enrollment declines

    Author: Julie Law-Marin
    Grades: 9-12

    Suggested Amount of Time: 60 - 80 Minutes
    Area of Study: Vietnamese Resettlement and Community Building

    Compelling Question
    • What is Vietnamese America?

    Lesson Questions
    • How is the Vietnamese American experience included and omitted from the schooling experience? 
    • In what ways can individuals, groups, and communities advocate for inclusion of the Vietnamese American experience in schools? 
    Lesson Objective

    Students will summarize the education conditions for first, 1.5, and second generation Vietnamese Americans and then determine recommendations to create conditions for a more inclusive school setting today. 

    Lesson Background

    Refugee Student Population (1975)

    While students were welcomed into schools, there were often few bilingual materials available in addition to teachers who could speak and write the Vietnamese language to support the newcomers. As a result, many students often fell behind on their secondary education. Many students felt pressure to put aside their first language and Vietnamese culture in order to meet the demands of assimilation with respect to society, media, schools and peer pressure. However, Vietnamese students often surpassed their peers in mathematics. Students and their families often would gain language learning through opportunities provided at bases such as Fort Chaffee. At the time, families may not have been permitted to leave the base, so they could not attend public schools. Many families also learned the English language and mannerisms by watching television shows at night. At the time, the Ford Administration had promised at least $300 for the first 100 Indochinese refugee students who entered the school system and $600 for students thereafter. By 1975, 20% of 137,000 refugees had resettled in California. At the time, most schools used English as a Second Language model, where the instructor was not necessarily required to have a fluency in Vietnamese. Adult refugees would often be hired on as aides to support classrooms, but did not have credentials to be the classroom teacher. Based on research at the time, many did advocate for a bilingual education for the Vietnamese students in which students would utilize both English and Vietnamese currently instead of an English-only model.

    Bilingual Education (1980s)

    With the increase of Indochinese and Hispanic students, there were debates on whether or not bilingual education would be the best option for students in addition to the funding source for programs. Proponents for bilingual education say that the programs help students with their self-confidence and feelings of self-worth. With English language gains, the first language can often be lost within three generations. 

    Vietnamese Dual Language Immersion Program (DLIP) (2013)

    Dual Language Immersion Programs were created to help Emergent Bilingual students who speak Vietnamese. While some members of the public claim that Vietnamese was not as marketable as other subjects, proponents have argued that it is beneficial for the growing Vietnamese American population. Dual Language programs have also brought in more families and community members who want to see the program grow as well as optimism for a group that has often been neglected in the education field over the years.

    Image Citation: Stavely, Z. (2022, August 29). Dual-immersion programs show promise in fighting enrollment declines. EdSource. https://edsource.org/2022/dual-immersion-programs-show-promise-in-fighting-enrollment-declines/677296 

    Historical Thinking Skills

    This lesson will facilitate student proficiency in continuity and change, one of Seixas’ historical thinking skills (Seixas & Morton, 2013). To consolidate and express understandings about continuity and change. Students consider how periodization helps us organize our thinking about continuity and change. It is a process of interpretation, by which we decide which events or developments constitute a period of history.

    Supplies
    • Educational attainment of Vietnamese population in the US, 2019
    Handouts
    1. Lesson Opener: Assessing Prior Knowledge (5 minutes)
    • Teachers ask the class the following questions: Students first share with a partner, then the teacher can elicit responses from the whole class.
      • Where do you study Vietnamese outside of school? (For non-Vietnamese students, ask them what spaces they think provide Vietnamese education.)
      • How often do you read or hear about texts or stories from Vietnamese writers?
    • Teachers can have students create a graphic organizer to record their responses before sharing out in small groups and the whole class. (10–15 minutes)
      • Have students work in groups of two to three to look at the following data (https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/chart/educational-attainment-of-vietnamese-population-in-the-u-s-2019/) and respond to the following questions:
        • Where do you see the most common schooling for Vietnamese students compared to other Asian groups and general Americans? Where do you see differences?
        • What is one conclusion or interpretation you can draw from this information?
        • What are question(s) that you have based on this data? What other information did you wish you knew about this data?
      • Class Discussion: These questions can then be shared to the whole class to check for understanding. 
    1. Interaction with lesson background information (10–15 minutes)
    • The teacher reviews the lesson background about current conditions for Vietnamese American youth in education. 
      • Optionally, students can read the lesson background content independently or with a partner. Instructors may want students to take notes or just discuss the implications of change over time for Vietnamese American students. 
    1. Interaction with sources with multiple reads (15–20 minutes)
    • Teacher Modeling: Choose an oral history from the “Oral History Stories” handout to listen as a whole class. 
      • First Read: After listening to the oral history, use one or more of the following questions to interact with the media (to be discussed with small groups, then with the whole class).
        • What is your first impression of this interview?
        • Why is this narrative important?
        • What do you notice about the individual's experiences?
        • How does this individual’s context (age, location, worldview, etc.) inform their perspectives on their lived experiences?
        • What is your takeaway from the individual’s experiences? 
        • How is the Vietnamese American experience included and omitted from the schooling experience? 
      • Second Read: With the same source from the first read, the teacher models the following: With a partner, have students use the following prompts to guide their discussion that will help with the assessment task
        • If you were the narrator, what changes would you have wanted?
        • Reflecting upon the experience, what can the educational system provide to accommodate students in a similar experience?
    1. Shared Learning: Students will model after the teacher to analyze and synthesize the remainder of the sources. (15–20 minutes)
    • The teacher has the option of assigning each pair or group a source, or having the students complete all sources together with a partner or group
    • Students are to continue with the same guiding questions (from the second read) to help them with their assessment task.
    1. Community Collaboration (15–20 minutes)
    • Have students create a graphic organizer to record their responses and discussion ideas to help with the assessment.
    • After students have completed analyzing and responding to the prompts for each of the oral history sources, have students review and find common responses or themes. 
    1. Cultural Production (20 minutes)
    • In groups, students will create a draft proposal (digitally or on poster paper) for inclusive school settings to support Vietnamese American students in regards to English Learner programs, Ethnic Studies, and overall campus culture. 
      • This proposal can also be created as a public service announcement video, or social media post. The final product can be open to a written, visual, or audio narrative.
    • The draft proposal can be a one-pager with the following information outlined:
      • Oral History Source - Who is the narrator of the interview and what is their background?
      • Challenge - What was the issue(s) that the narrator faced?
      • Proposal - What are two suggestions that your group would like to propose that addresses the lesson objective?
      • Include graphics or pictures that will help support the proposal.
      • If time is limited, put students in small groups of three or four for small-group presentations. 
    1. Conclusive Dialogue (10 minutes)
    • After each group has presented their one-page proposal, the teacher wraps up the lesson with a reflection. Optional prompts:
      • What were some common suggestions? 
      • What were some ‘Aha!’ moments after hearing from the group proposals?

    Students will work in groups to draft proposals (digitally or on poster paper) for inclusive school settings to support Vietnamese American students in regards to English learner programs, Ethnic Studies, and overall campus culture. Students will present these findings to their classmates. This proposal can also be created as a public service announcement video, or social media post. 

    • Engagement: Consider the following method to support with lesson engagement:
      • Include activities that foster the use of imagination to solve novel and relevant problems, or make sense of complex ideas in creative ways
      • Use prompts or scaffolds for visualizing desired outcome
    • Representation: Consider the following method to support with multiple means of representation:
      • Make all key information in the dominant language (e.g., English) also available in first languages (e.g., Spanish) for learners with limited-English proficiency and in ASL for learners who are deaf
    • Action and Expression: Consider the following method to support in presenting their learning in multiple ways:
      • Provide graphic organizers and templates for data collection and organizing information

    For additional ideas to support your students, check out the UDL Guidelines at CAST, 2018 http://udlguidelines.cast.org.

    • Emerging: Consider the following method to support with emerging students:
      • Writing: Require vocabulary notebooks with non-linguistic representations or L1 translations 
        • During integrated ELD, teachers may sometimes offer strategic primary language support for EL students who are newcomers or at the earliest level of Emerging proficiency.
    • Expanding: Consider the following method to support with expanding students:
      • Writing: Provide writing frames
        • In response to a prompt, the teacher offers a sentence frame orally and/or in writing to support expression of student thinking. Frames are adjusted based upon specific grammatical structure, key vocabulary, content learning, and language proficiency level descriptors, etc. Frames are a temporary scaffold that require modification. 
    • Bridging: Consider the following method to support with bridging students:
      • Writing: Require academic writing and the use of target academic vocabulary 
        • Apply domain­-specific vocabulary and general Academic vocabulary in open sentence frames to perform functions, like describing or explaining, that target specific grammatical structures.

    For additional guidance around scaffolding for multilingual learners, please consult the following resources:

    1. Letter - Have students work in groups to create a letter or plan to present to the local school board or district officials on what recommendations they would make to support the academic and social-emotional success of Vietnamese American students. The action plan should be concrete and grounded in statistics and research. The teacher can decide the extent to which the letter is sent out. However, if time permits, student groups can read their letters to the class and have students vote on which letter was most persuasive. 
    2. Local Community Groups - Have students research what local Vietnamese community groups are in their area and how they can support the learning of language and culture. They can also look into events hosted by these groups and attend one if willing and able.
    3. Vietnamese Dual Language Immersion Program - Students can explore what local schools offer Vietnamese language courses and/or Vietnamese dual language programs.

    Bacon, M., & Truong, V. 2022. Vietnamese Dual Language Immersion: Commodifying an Uncommodified Language and Culture. In L.M. Dorner, D. Palmer, C.G. Cervantes-Soon, D. 

    Britt, K. 2020, May 11. English learner toolkit of strategies. California County Superintendents. https://cacountysupts.org/english-learner-toolkit-of-strategies/

    California Department of Education & English Learner Support Division. (2012). California English Language Development standards (Electronic Edition) kindergarten through grade 12 (F. Ong & J. McLean, Eds.). California Department of Education. https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/er/documents/eldstndspublication14.pdf

    California Educators Together. (n.d.). ELA / ELD framework. https://www.caeducatorstogether.org/resources/6537/ela-eld-framework

    CAST. 2018. The UDL guidelines. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

    Heiman & E.R. Crawford (Eds.), 2023. Critical Consciousness in Dual Language Bilingual Education (112-120). Routledge.

    Congdon, S. 1980, August 10. The Battle of bilingual education. The Washington Posthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/entertainment/books/1980/08/10/the-battle-of-bilingual-education/9a7cc4e1-f779-42d8-ae95-31c1aae23329/  

    Maeroff, G.L. 1975, October 12. US schools baffle Vietnamese refugee children. The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com/1975/10/12/archives/us-schools-baffle-vietnamese-refugee-children-us-schools-often.html?auth=login-google1tap&login=google1tap 

    Maloof, V.M., Rubin, D.L., & Miller, A.N. 2006. Cultural competence and identity in cross-cultural adaptation: The role of a Vietnamese heritage language school. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 255-273.

    Pew Research Center. 2021, April 29. Educational attainment of Vietnamese population in the US, 2019. Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/chart/educational-attainment-of-vietnamese-population-in-the-u-s-2019/   

    San Diego County Office of Education. (n.d.). Providing appropriate scaffoldinghttps://www.sdcoe.net/educators/multilingual-education-and-global-achievement/oracy-toolkit/providing-appropriate-scaffolding#scaffolding

    Sellery, K. 2019. Looking beyond the “model minority”: Achievement gaps among Asian American Students. California Schoolshttps://publications.csba.org/issue/summer-2019/looking-beyond-the-model-minority-achievement-gaps-among-asian-american-students/ 

    Sexias, P. & Morton, T. 2013. The big six: Historical thinking concepts. Nelson Education.

    Southeast Asia Resource Action Center (SEARAC). 2013. ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS & SOUTHEAST ASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITIES. SEARAC. http://www.searac.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/English-Language-Learners-Southeast-Asian-American-CommLooking beyond the “model minority”: Achievement gaps among Asian American studentsunities.pdf 

    Tulare County Office of Education. (n.d.). Strategies for ELD. https://commoncore.tcoe.org/Content/Public/doc/Alpha-CollectionofELDStrategies.pdf 

    Viet Stories: Vietnamese American Oral History Project (VAOHP). (2019, February 12 & March 14). Oral History of Alexander Trần. UCI Southeast Asian Archive. https://calisphere.org/item/ark:/81235/d8pk1c/?order=0 http://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ucldc-nuxeo-ref-media/111dff8c-7504-4a14-b4ad-ffa08836dd6c 

    Viet Stories: Vietnamese American Oral History Project (VAOHP). 2012, December 1. Oral History of Paul Chí Hoàng. UCI Southeast Asian Archive.  https://calisphere.org/item/ark:/81235/d8tp08/ 

    Viet Stories: Vietnamese American Oral History Project (VAOHP). 2019, February 18. Oral History of Thái Văn Lê. UCI Southeast Asian Archive. http://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ucldc-nuxeo-ref-media/c58d8675-73c7-40bd-8ab2-625b2a86ea0a 

    Viet Stories: Vietnamese American Oral History Project (VAOHP). 2010, November 5. Oral History of Roger Minh Lê. UCI Southeast Asian Archive. http://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ucldc-nuxeo-ref-media/bf410c86-8b6b-49c4-a872-e9156dfba425 

    Viet Stories: Vietnamese American Oral History Project (VAOHP). 2010, November 10. Oral History of Tiffany Lê. UCI Southeast Asian Archive. https://calisphere.org/item/ark:/81235/d8c56b/

    Vietnamese American Heritage Foundation & Vietnamese American Oral History Project, UC Irvine. (2010). Vietnamese American Heritage Foundation (T. Le & R. Le, Interviewers). https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ucldc-nuxeo-ref-media/84956984-bddb-49fd-af97-36f002a87b42 

    Supplementary Sources: 

    Expectations about school and community. (n.d.). Web.stanford.edu. https://web.stanford.edu/~hakuta/www/archives/syllabi/E_CLAD/Course3/vietnam/page4.html

    Viet Stories: Vietnamese American Oral History Project (VAOHP). 2014, May 25. Oral History of Vân Dương. UCI Southeast Asian Archive.  https://calisphere.org/item/ark:/81235/d8qs0c/ 

    Model Curriculum

    Standard(s)

    Grade(s)